Connect with us

Govt & Politics

OP: Mayors Coleman and Ginther dropped the soccer ball

614now

Published

on

 [su_testimonial photo=”http://614now.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/croyle-thumb1.jpg”]By Steve Croyle[/su_testimonial]
TOPIC: Crew move

Ginther, where’s your head at

It’s not at all a shock that Columbus Crew owner Anthony Precourt has put the relocation gun to Mayor Ginther’s head in hopes of scoring a downtown stadium. Ginther is claiming that the city was blindsided by the news that Precourt has been discussing his options with Austin, Texas, but Crew Fans, even the casual ones, have been lamenting the horrifically bad location of the Crew’s digs for years. The fairgrounds, quite simply, suck. There is no apre futbol feel—no bars or restaurants. Just a massive vacant lot, you hustle in and out of. The State of Ohio was happy to lease the land for virtually nothing, because they knew they were going to rob people blind on the parking. People tempted to circumvent the parking hassle by shimmying across the railroad tracks are met with aggressive law enforcement. That’s understandable given the safety concerns, but why not acquiesce to public demand and create a pedestrian crossing?

Mike Coleman ignored the issue for years, but Mike Coleman spent two full terms in an ego-induced fog. We’re talking about a guy who didn’t realize how important craft brewing is until Stone came knocking with an opportunity our city leaders fumbled. Stone founder Greg Koch wanted to bring everything back home to Central Ohio, but we weren’t ready. Coleman and his cadre of buffoons didn’t realize that craft beer is a tourism draw, just as they didn’t realize that plunking a stadium on the North End of the Fairgrounds set the Crew up for failure when it comes to attendance.

The city didn’t even look into revitalizing the skanky stretch of Linden some of the braver Crew fans park in on game day. This location is so bad, the city is missing out on the potential to make hundreds of thousands of dollars when we host Team USA games, because the people who come from all around the world to see these games, don’t have anywhere to go to blow money before and after games.

It’s true that Major League Soccer is the global soccer equivalent of Mexican Winter League baseball, but that doesn’t stop other cities with MLS franchises from packing the house on a regular basis. It’s all about location, and Columbus never corrected a horrific error in judgement. It’s not like anybody broke the bank on that stadium, by the way. It was a relatively cheap build. That said, it’s actually a great venue for the State Fair, and the State of Ohio should be willing to pay a fair price for it.

Now the pressure is on. If Ginther wants to keep Major League Soccer in town (and he should), the city needs to move quickly on a downtown-oriented arena. A modular, multi-use arena with a retractable roof would be wise, because Columbus could then put itself in position to host a Final Four, or a college football bowl game. You’d want extra seats to accommodate the increased demand of those World Cup qualifiers.

Going forward, we need our city leaders to be proactive rather than reactive. If you’re into betting, you should probably bet on the Crew packing up and heading to Austin. You can’t blame Precourt for this. The city has demonstrated a history of taking so many things for granted. Maybe that’s because our last two mayoral administrations have been distracted by insulating themselves from the legal consequences of taking bribes, and selling out the city’s poor.

If Precourt does move the Crew, Ginther needs to get back to the table with Major League Soccer to see if there’s a possibility of getting a do-over. Columbus built a strong relationship with USA Soccer, and we can’t afford to lose that if the Crew leaves. A larger venue with world class amenities could put Columbus in the mix as a World Cup site the next time the event comes to Columbus. There’s no reason we can’t be a soccer town, aside from poor leadership.

Hopefully Ginther has the ability to move quickly and salvage the relationship, but the fact that he claims he didn’t see this coming doesn’t bode well.

COMMENT BELOW…


QUICK TAKE I

Kasich’s sneak attack

Topic: Kasich’s campaign

John Kasich isn’t a nice guy. He’s a staunch conservative with right-leaning social values. He’s recently positioning himself as a moderate, but it’s difficult to trust him if he assumes power where a legislature would lean hard to the right as well.

Nevertheless, he’s executing a brilliant campaign to run for the White House in 2020.

By packaging himself as a moderate who regularly criticizes Trump, Kasich will secure mainstream support from the GOP. With Democrats effectively sitting on their hands doing nothing, Kasich will have ammunition to present himself as the only meaningful option.

That’s not a bad scenario, if there is enough of a progressive coalition in the House and Senate to keep Kasich in the middle, but Democrats are not setting themselves up for gains in the House or the Senate any time soon.

The most effective complaint against Democrats will be their inability to present any options for fixing the Affordable Care Act. While the GOP has failed to present the better deal they promised, Democrats have turned a blind eye to loopholes that allow insurance companies to abandon exchanges, as well as the unsustainable nature of the subsidies that offset the failure of the ACA to control premiums, which would make coverage affordable.

Our government depends on a balance of power. Liberals and Conservatives meet in the middle to forge compromise to pass legislation that is required, while the other, idealistic concepts are argued over until they can be whittled into something both sides find acceptable. That’s how it’s supposed to work. Right now, the Democrats are no holding up their end of the bargain.

If you think Trump is bad, wait until you have president that can unify the right, while the politicians on the left are still checking the weather.


QUICK TAKE II

Put up or shut up, Columbus

Topic: Off year elections

Columbus has a chance to send a strong message to the Democratic Party, as well as city officials this November. There are three council seats up for grabs, and the incumbents who are vulnerable are three of the worst sycophants in city hall. Hardin, Brown, and Tyson have signed off on tax abatements, and worked against economic diversity for years. They’ve been selling this city out to the highest bidders, and it’s time to make it stop.

Yes We Can is a progressive movement intended to hold Democrats accountable for straying from traditional progressive values. It represents a recommitment to the middle class. Rather than artificially inflate downtown luxury unit occupancies with generous tax abatements that place an increased burden on other communities, Yes We Can will level the playing field and spread some of those generous incentives to people who can’t afford million dollar condos.

They offer two candidates: Will Petrik, and Jasmine Ayres. Both are on the ballot for City Council, and both will prove to be a thorn in the side of an Administration trained to gorge itself from one trough. Two council members standing up for the regular joe is a big help, but if you’re willing to be bold and use your pencil, you can send a third working class warrior into the the fray.

Joe Motil is blue collar guy who lives in Clintonville and openly wonders why his property taxes are higher than those of his friends in Bexley, Upper Arlington and other suburbs that have better schools, and services. He actually doesn’t wonder, because the answer is clear: the city hasn’t been treating everybody fairly.

Voters often overlook these odd year elections. We ignore these city council seats, and then wonder why the only people running for President are scumbags.

Well, the scumbags get in at the lower levels. Most of our current city government was appointed. They retained their seats in reelection bids, but they weren’t initially elected. That’s probably why they don’t respect the voters.

Now’s your chance to make them pay for it.


These are opinions, dude!
The opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of 614Now, 614 Mediagroup or its employees. Take a deep breath… it’s just one man’s opinion. If you want your voice heard beyond the comments section, we invite you to send us your thoughts HERE.
Continue Reading

Govt & Politics

OP-ED: Heartbeat Bill will likely affect 11yo Ohio rape victim

Caitlin Horwatt

Published

on

The passage of Ohio’s recent “heartbeat bill,” signed by Governor DeWine, marks a massive and distressing win in the conservative quest to outright ban abortion. All parties supporting the bill—from DeWine to legislators and lobbyists—are well aware that the action will be blocked by courts as they uphold Roe v. Wade, which protects the right to abortion until 24 weeks gestation. We should be frightened as we explore whether their big picture goal is to get Roe v. Wade overturned by the decidedly conservative Court.

By banning abortion after a heartbeat is detected, the law prohibits abortion as early as eight weeks, well before many women know they are pregnant. Add in the already mandatory twenty-four hour waiting period between first appointment and procedure, and the likelihood of legal abortion for even a pregnancy detected early seems slim. The law is an blatant attempt to ban women’s right to choose.

The Guttmacher Institute found that ​1 in 4 women​ has had an abortion before age 45. The Pew Research Center found that ​58% of Americans support legal abortion ​in all or most cases, with polarizing views against abortion coming mostly from Republican and religious Americans. These statistics fail to depict, though, how traumatic the impact can be for women forced to carry a child to term when she does not have the means or support to do so. The law is meant to protect the fetus at a term that is far earlier than the 22 to 24 weeks at which it is viable, all at the cost of the mother.

BROUGHT TO YOU BY

The bill notably does not give exceptions for cases of rape and incest, only allowing exceptions for medical necessity to save the mother’s life. This means an ​11 year-old rape victim from Massillon​ will likely have to carry her rapist’s baby to term.

Heartbeat bills do not ban abortion; they ban legal abortion. I think of a sign I saw during the 2017 Women’s March: a metal coat hanger with the words “WE WON’T GO BACK” scrawled below. The passage of this recent law achingly raises questions of whether or not we will go back.

Women who now find themselves pregnant could have their lives forever changed. Even if they choose to surrender the baby after birth, the cost of a pregnancy is astronomical and healthcare is far from a certainty in this country. If the pregnancy was caused by rape, the potential for trauma only escalates. Women will have few places to turn, with the most vulnerable unable to seek safe healthcare and the potential high for maternal deaths as part of botched abortions.

The ACLU and other organizations are already moving to challenge the ban in court. I can’t shake the looming feeling that these challenges will only play into the hands of those anti-abortion supporters, and that we may be entering the most important fight of our generation in this fight for a woman’s right to choose.

Continue Reading

Govt & Politics

OP-ED: ‘Red flag’ is far cry from where Ohio gun law should be

Joanne Strasser

Published

on

Last weekend, a man entered a synagogue in Poway, California armed with a rifle. The Washington Post reports that prior to him entering the place of worship, the accused shooter wrote a 7-page letter about his hatred for Jewish people. He believed killing them would “glorify God.” Below is an op-ed from one Columbus mother who believes Ohio should be taking a stronger stance against guns following of the Poway tragedy.

Even in light of this past weekend’s synagogue shooting, DeWine is still unwilling to change Ohio’s gun laws. He is, however, advocating for Ohio to pass a red flag law, which would allow law enforcement to seize guns from individuals deemed a societal risk.

This isn’t the first time the red flag law was floated in the Ohio Legislature.  In the wake of last year’s Parkland High School shooting in Florida, former Gov. Kasich backed the proposed law, which ultimately failed to gain support.

Opposition to the legislation stems from Republican lawmakers’ belief that it infringes on the constitution rights to bear arms and proper due process of law. However, 14 other states have already implemented the red flag law.

BROUGHT TO YOU BY

Moms Demand Action, a national gun control organization, notes that 42% of attackers exhibit warning signs before shootings occur. And although this legislation would only be a small step in the right direction, it could help save lives.

But ultimately, statistics don’t matter to politicians, who are dependent on dollars from the gun lobby.  And until our elected officials decide that Ohioans‘ safety comes first, any measure, regardless of how small and sensible, will fail. 

Ohio Republicans need to take a long hard look at their agenda and ask themselves if it truly serves our needs. Which is more important: our children feeling safe at school or campaign contributions? 

The red flag law is a common-sense measure, and while it’s a far cry from where Ohio gun restriction needs to be, it’s certainly a start.

Continue Reading

Govt & Politics

Daily double: New legislation calls for huge minimum wage hike

614now

Published

on

If new legislation passes, Ohio’s minimum wage could nearly double in the next several years. Two Democratic senators are working to increase hourly pay from $8.55 to $15.

State Senators Cecil Thomas (D-Cincinnati) and Hearcel Craig (D-Columbus) introduced the legislation Wednesday, reports 10TV.

BROUGHT TO YOU BY

The new legislation stipulates a $12 minimum per hour beginning in January 2020 and a $1 yearly increase until 2023 to keep up with inflation.

“We have an obligation to make life better for the people in our state and that includes providing living wages,” said Sen. Thomas, per 10TV. “This increase to the minimum wage will help workers and their families have a better life. And when people have more money, it also benefits the local economy from increased spending in the community.”

Continue Reading
X